yoooreo.blogg.se - Devdocs stack overflow

#DEVDOCS STACK OVERFLOW UPDATE#
#DEVDOCS STACK OVERFLOW ANDROID#
#DEVDOCS STACK OVERFLOW VERIFICATION#

#DEVDOCS STACK OVERFLOW ANDROID#

Note: You’ll beĪble to target Android 13 later this year. Apps that don’tĭeclare the permission will get a string of zeros. Permission when your app targets Android 13 or above. Require this permission declaration when your apps are able to targetĪndroid 13 instead of starting with Android 12.Īction Items If you use an advertising ID, you must declare the AD_ID That we will give developers more time to ease the transition. Your app targeting API level to 31 (Android 12).

#DEVDOCS STACK OVERFLOW UPDATE#

We alsoĪnnounced that you need to declare an AD_ID permission when you update Phones, tablets, and Android TV starting April 1, 2022. When users choose to delete theirĪdvertising ID in order to opt out of personalization advertising,ĭevelopers will receive a string of zeros instead of the identifier if We added new restrictions on identifiers used byĪpps that target children. Last July, we announced Advertising policy changes to help bolster It is pretty much the same thing as documented in the official example here ( version as of this writing). Here is the part of the code around the authorization flow, and the URLs for the different client IDs are what was produced on the $stderr.puts url line. Here are the URLs generated by my app (I use the ruby google client APIs) and the only difference between them is the client_id - January 2021, December 2021, March 2022. The other two give me an "Error 400: invalid_request" and do not even let me choose the "internal" account. Of those, only the December 2021 works and lets me choose which account to authenticate with before it either accepts it or rejects it with "Error 403: org_internal" (this is expected).

The oldest one is from January 2021, another one from December 2021, and one I created today - March 2022. I was able to reproduce the same problem in a dev domain.

#DEVDOCS STACK OVERFLOW VERIFICATION#

This is a command line script, so I use the "copy/paste" verification method as documented here hence the urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob redirect URI (copy/paste is the only friendly way to run this on a headless machine which has no browser).

Another client id in the same project works and there are no obvious differences between the client IDs - they are both "Desktop" type which only gives me a Client ID and Client secret that are different.

I do have "Trust internal, domain-owned apps" enabled for the domain.

Therefore any mentions of Google review of the project, or publishing status are irrelevant

The OAuth consent screen for this project is marked as "Internal".

How do I get through this error? It is important to note that: If you’re the app developer, make sure that these request details This content has not been reviewed or verified by Google. The content in this section has been provided by the app developer. You can let the app developer know that this app doesn't comply with OAuth 2.0 policy for keeping apps secure. You can't sign in to this app because it doesn't comply with Google's Recently, after making another client_id in the same project, I started getting an error message similar to the one described in localhost redirect_uri does not work for Google Oauth2 (results in 400: invalid_request error). We have some apps (or maybe we should call them a handful of scripts) that use Google APIs to facilitate some administrative tasks.